Injustice done to Arvind Kejrival and his subordinates. Who will return their lost reputation ?
The Rouse Avenue CBI court’s verdict given by the concerned judge Jitendra Singh is being termed as historical as he not only unambiguously discharged the former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejrival, former deputy CM Manish Sisodia scot free discharging them alongwith all the other accused saying that there is not a single evidence against them to prove their involvement in any shabby deal in the Delhi government’s new excise policy nor had they received a single pie as bribe but has also fixed the accountability on the CBI officers who has framed the false cases against AAP leaders and others leading to their jail terms for several months for no false of theirs.
The Rouse Avenue court judge has catagorically asked the CBI reprimanding it directing that the punitive departmental action against the investigating officers for roping in the the Excise officials and AAP leaders in false, fabricated and biased cases.
Sounds shocking that now since the AAP leaders and other officers of excise department etc have been exonerated by the lower court, the moot question arises as to who will give them back their spoiled reputation, the suffering of their families, the mental torture suffered by them all these years including by their children and waves and their subsequent defeat in elections unseating them out of power on the baseless, fabricated and false charges now don’t discharged scotfree by the Rouse Avenue court.
This judgement is not only a clear indication and exposure of the BJP for framing the false cases against the
Former Delhi CM Arvind Kejrival , former deputy CM Manish Sisodia, MP Sanjay Singh and two others in order to defame the reputation of AAP leaders and the party it has also proved amply that the saffron party’s top leadership has been succcessful in their political games of manipulations by winning in Delhi elections and deboarding the AAP from power.
The opposition political party leaders of Congress, AAP, left including all the constituents of India National Developmental Inclusuve Alliance have constantly been raising their voice against the misuse of the CBI, ED, IT and other agencies to silence the voice of the dissent and to denigrate their reputation and leaders like Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi etc confronting several cases on alleged fabricated grounds. The West Bengal chief minister Mamata Bannerjee too is facing the ED and CBI actions finally compelled to argue her own case in the Supreme Court in front of the SC bench.
This is not the first case of the clear cut aquittal of Arvind Kejrival, former CM , Manish Sisodia, former deputy CM, Sanjay Singh MP, and former minister Satyendra Jain who had undergone several years of punishment in Tihar Prisons, but the former NDTV chief and owner Prannav Roy after years of victimisation finally compelling to sell NDTV was set scot free giving a clear example of his indictment on the grounds of false and baseless charges misusing the various agencies finally going scot free.
The then senior journalist and news anchor of repute Vinod Dua was also falsely implicated few years ago finally leading to his shocking death. Even one of the former veteran women journalists like Mrinal Pamey was roped in a false cases on serious charges set free later in. The several cases instituted against media men and media houses on false and fabricated grounds just because they have been vociferous against the ruling party dispensation on genuine issues have led to several media protests in the past.
The point is how long will the opposition and voice of dissent be curbed by misusing the investigating agencies on fabricated, biased and baseless charges.
The six hundred page judgement delivered by the Rouse Avenue Court judge Jitendra Singh is historic and worth lauding because for the first time he has very boldly while slamming the CBI said that : To compel the accused to face the rigours of a full fledged criminal trial in the stark absence of any legally admissible material connecting them to the alleged offences would not serve the ends of justice; it would instead substitute a manifest miscarriage of discharge and an abuse of the criminal ricess, offending the most basic tenets of fairness and the rule of law. Reprimanding the investigating agencies including the CBI for being biased and vindictive the Judge described the investigation asa PREMEDITATED AND CHOREOGRAPHED EXERCISE wherein roles appear to have been retrospectvely assigned to suit a precincieved narrative. In a rare example ever seen, the judge also recommended appropriate departmental proceedings against the erring investigating officer for framing A1 as an accused in the absence of any material against him in order to d x the accountability and the institutional credibility of the investigative machinery is preserved.A-1 or the first accused in the case was Kuldeep Singh, a former excise department official. The judgement said that it finds difficult to comprehend how in the admitted absence of any incriminating evidences these public servent were arrayed as accused. The court said the case against Singh was “solely on” inadmissible hearsay attributed to an approver. The judgement also criticised the Executive ( Lt. Governor of Delhi) for granting prosecution sanction.
It may be recalled that almost all the leaders are behind bars two years ago in the Delhi excise act and a fabricated case was launched against Arvind Kejrival, Manish Sisodia and others with regard to the new excise police with the allegations of receiving 100 crores from the South Lobby. The alleged bribe recieved according to the CBI was used for Punjab and Goa elections.
People are questioning if the fate of the senior leaders and chief minister such as Arvind Kejrival, a crusader against corruption and his subordinate is such then what would be the fate of the common man ?
